LH6 AFM Delete in 2025 & Why You Will Need to Change the Cam

spfautsch

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2024
Posts
87
Location
Montgomery City, MO
This is sort of a follow-up on a question thread I posted several weeks ago that turned into a bit of a flamer and has since been mercifully deleted. Apologies to @TollKeeper, but I think I have sufficiently answered the why now.

As I'm waiting on some parts and wont be able to finish this job until sometime next week I wanted to post my thoughts and observations while they're still fresh in my memory, as it's not been improving proportionally with age.

First off, to the point of the need for a cam swap. After pulling the heads off yesterday afternoon I spent most of the last 5-6 hours working with a dial indicator and degree wheel to see what's up with these AFM cams.

IMG_20250625_174940762_HDR.jpg

Here's what I found - on these dual-function cams the AFM lobes have both greater lift and duration than the non-AFM lobes. Valve opening events, when measured at 0.050" tappet lift happened 3-4 degrees sooner on AFM cylinders than on their full-duty counterparts while closing events seemed to be timed identically. Additionally, the AFM lobes measured an average of 0.286" lift at the tappet, while non-AFM lobes measured an average of 0.275" lift. While these aren't drastic differences, if one were to install standard lifters on all cylinders without changing the cam, the difference in area under the curve would certainly cause a large enough difference in cylinder filling to create random lean misfires on the cylinders getting the bigger intake air charge. Though it's widely been posted that the AFM cylinders exhibit lower compression after a lifter-only swap on one of these engines, by my estimation it seems the evidence indicates that the non-AFM cylinders would be the ones demonstrating lesser cylinder filling and thus lower static compression. But as I have no intention of expending a set of head bolts and gaskets to test this theory, feel free to speculate.

However you look at it, this satisfies my desire to understand the why behind the need for a non-AFM cam for this job. Although if you have one of the gen 5 engines that have AFM / DFM on all 8 cylinders, I think you'd be perfectly fine running the stock cam.

Next topic is parts. As I already had a large collection of LS7 lifters and other assorted pieces I chose to cherry pick the parts I knew I absolutely needed instead of buying a kit. I won't discourage you from any vendor selling such a kit, but will only mention my personal experience with the vendors I dealt with for individual part sets that were either an exceptionally good or bad value.

First off is lifter trays. As I already have a Prime subscription I found what I thought was a good deal on a set of 4 lifter trays on Amazon. Save yourself the trouble. When I installed one yesterday while using the degree wheel I found that the tray would rock from side to side as the adjacent cylinder's lifters moved. The old trays didn't exhibit this characteristic. Also just looking at the webbing inside the moldings as well as the fact that the material thickness was such that the retainer bolts didn't contact the plastic at all, these just seemed like a recipe for disaster.

Solution: Rock Auto has the GM trays for less than $12 each. This is one of the parts I'm waiting on so I'll have to post an update with a comparison later, but meanwhile I'm kicking myself for pinching pennies on this item.

Second order of business is the valley cover plate to block off the VLOM oil passages. I made the mistake of finding one on eBay from a seller that had US based inventory but the parts were manufactured in China. The casting quality was terrible and I feared there would be leaks around the oil pressure sensor port so I asked to return it. It didn't go as well as I would've liked. The picture below is a comparison of their part next to another that was located on Amazon thanks to a suggestion by @Mooseman.

IMG_20250616_143510133.jpg

One of the "good deals" I ran into was a mostly complete Mahle branded gasket set from Rock Auto that contains two head gaskets, intake gaskets, exhaust manifold gaskets, the exhaust donut for the passenger side, valve stem seals (important thing to consider on a high-mileage buggy), a valley cover gasket, all 16 fuel injector o-rings, and a number of other gaskets you may or may not need.

The other "good deal" was a set of Fel-Pro branded head bolts for less than could be found elsewhere. Combined shipping costs may make this a better deal than if not buying a bunch of stuff from Rock Auto simultaneously.

Tips, in no particular order...

* Remove the temperature sensor from the driver side cylinder head before you attempt to remove the head bolt. It's a cheap and common part, but if there's nothing wrong with yours, you'll be money ahead removing it as I broke the bejeesus out of the connector shell on mine removing that head bold w/ a power-operated tool.

* Plan on purging your refrigerant system and buy a full set of seals to replace every one you touch as these vehicles are coming alarmingly close to being licensable as historic vehicles. Removing the condenser core, while possibly not absolutely necessary, creates a very useful "mechanic's cubby hole" that will make everything you work on afterwards a much smaller pain in the posterior. Trust me, your sternum will thank you for not trying to work in a "superman pose".

IMG_20250625_100020039.jpg

* Be careful removing the quick-disconnect heater hoses as I've heard they're easily broken and can only be purchased from GM.

* I'm sure this is old news to anyone owning one of these vehicles, but for the love of !doG be extra careful when removing nuts, bolts and spark plugs that might fall into the no-mans-land that encompasses the entire underhood area. Thus far in this project I'm only needing to recover a lost #5 spark plug and one of the fancy Dorman stainless steel exhaust stud nuts (that won't stick to a magnet). I'm very happy to report that none of my cherished wrenches, sockets, or extensions have been sacrificed to the aforementioned black hole!

Also, there is the topic of ECM reflashing to disable the switch to 4 cylinder mode and the subsequent DTCs related to disconnecting the VLOM solenoid control connector that typically accompany an AFM delete procedure. I have absolutely nothing bad to say about the assumed "forum preferred" vendor Jeremy @ http://lime-swap.com, but with some searching I found another mail-order guy that was closer to me and 75% less - Branden @ http://lt1swap.com. Branden not only shared experiences with me on older (AKA "antique") platforms such as the gen 2 LT-1, but also shared some first-hand experiences he had with another gremlin I've been chasing - the T42 transmission controller weirdness I've been struggling with and chronicled here.

I have much more to share on this subject and will gladly answer questions to the best of my ability. I've spent dozens if not hundreds of hours trying to find a truly definitive answer to the question of "do you need to replace the cam if performing an AFM delete?". I'm not claiming to be the authority on this subject, but I'm now comfortable in the reflection of the knowledge I've personally gathered that this is a legitimate statement.

Hope to share more as this project continues.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mooseman
I forgot to post this nugget yesterday. At some point in the last 60 days I disabled AFM by plugging off the brake booster MAP sensor. Can you spot a noticeable dip in fuel economy? I cant.

fuelly-consumption-all.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mooseman
Got to drive it about 150 miles round-trip yesterday, running like a top and no lifters ticking! The DIC fuel consumption average is reporting 17.2 mpg for the current tank, half of which was driven before the mechanical delete. Since disabling AFM I've been seeing about 5-10% better calculated mileage than the DIC has been reporting, and it's been much more consistent than it was when AFM was still active. And as reported elsewhere, not really seeing a noticeable drop in calculated / realized fuel economy. More on this later...

Wanted to share a few more pics - as I didn't want to mess with the oil pump and pickup tube I painted a timing mark on top of the chain guide. Any vehicle with 50K or more miles will have enough slack in the timing chain to remove it without touching the pump. And if it's seen decent oiling will have reached a plateau where it won't really stretch a lot more. Mine has 216K on it and it was still a bit of a struggle to get the chain over the back of the cam gear (all 3 sprocket bolts must be removed and the cam slid back).


IMG_20250628_124606498-150x150.jpg

Here's the Sac City Corvette front cover alignment tool. I hate buying tools I may only need once, but at least I'll know the front main shouldn't be leaking. There may be cheaper ones available, but having used the Dorman and then later the Sac City rear cover tool, I can attest that the Dorman is nowhere near as foolproof as these.

IMG_20250703_154308742_HDR-150x150.jpg

Back to the theory behind cylinder deactivation. Maybe GM has published it somewhere, but I've been thinking about it quite a bit and still scratching my head. Why would they add so many failure-prone systems to an engine that would otherwise run for 300-400k with minimal other issues (oil leaks notwithstanding)? They have to see the thing out of warranty, and dealerships don't replace failed lifters on the cheap.

Then I ran across a video by a couple youtubers that somehow scored a 3+ hour interview with Greg Banish. For those who don't know the name, Greg has worked as a production calibrator for two of the big three, for numerous aftermarket companies as well as privately as an emissions and tuning specialist. In short, he's the Smoky Yunick or maybe even the Leonardo DaVinci of modern fuel injection and emission control systems. If you have any interest in tuning, when he talks you would be well advised to listen.

He made mention of a certain instance where aggressive DFCO (fuel cutoff during decel) caused the emissions certification to fail because not only does it pump an abundance of oxygen into the cats that could potentially cause them to run into meltdown, it also lowers the temperature of the substrate thus increasing emissions ever-so-slightly. I'm going to go out on a limb and state my belief that this is the primary reason OEMs implemented cylinder deactivation in place of DFCO - to keep some amount of combustion happening that would keep the catalysts at operating temperature.

Here's the video - the earliest bit of commentary on DFCO is around 0:15:00.

145. Greg Banish on Calibrating Vehicles, Compliance and the Aftermarket
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mooseman
One other pointer I forgot to add - while you have the A/C system purged (and you're replacing all the seals w/ new) it would be wise to pull the receiver / dryer and inspect it for corrosion. This is the second one of these I've witnessed personally. Though this one wasn't overtly leaking, the first one (on a 2004 TB EXT) was, and two pro mechanics had ran out of ideas / time trying to locate it. The "sock" fits tight enough to diffuse the leak so it's pretty much impossible to identify passively with a gas leak detector.

Note the pitting caused by corrosion on the middle stripe where the rubber "sock" touches the R/D. It's also worth mentioning that when I pulled the R/D out, several ounces of what looked like muddy water fell out of the sock.

IMG_20250708_134059434-150x150.jpg

IMG_20250708_134047413.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mooseman
Isn't it crazy the amount of garbage tech that OEMs will add just to try and appease the EPA and meet CAFE requirements at our expense? Later on they also added auto stop/start and DFM, both of which don't do much for MPGs neither.

Neat alignment tool for the timing chain cover. Didn't know they existed but I haven't done one of these in a while. I just used the balancer to do this alignment at the time. Looking around, there are a multitude of them on Amazon.
 
Not to mention my newest pet peeve, gas direct injection. While it does improve economy, it does so at the expense of low end torque and contributes to excess carbon and oil fouling.

Former GM Powertrain Engineer REVEALS Truth on Quality Issues

This is another very long interview that is worth every second of your attention. Mostly talking about planned obsolescence, but around 0:36:10 he talks about DFM and that segues into how much he dislikes DI.

My daughter was recently looking for a newer used car to replace her 2013 Equinox with the 2.4 DI Ecotech. She naturally started looking at GM products as I've been a dyed in the wool GM fanatic my entire life. I had to finally tell her to scratch GM off the list because the longevity is just not there anymore, especially in a one owner used car that's almost or just out of warranty. It's sad.
 
Well as with all good stories, this one ends with a twist.

Was running great and no issues to report save for the fact that the oil level seemed to be gradually increasing. After about 350 miles I drained about 6 oz of oil out that looked a lot like Guinness. Awesome, a head gasket is leaking...

In doing some research I find nothing good at all about the Fel-Pro head bolts. I was suspicious of them when torquing because some seemed to be need a lot more force to get the last 70 degrees. I will edit my previous post recommending them, because after tearing it most of the way back down I found the 10 primary bolts on the driver side were nowhere near as tight when breaking them loose. All the large bolts on the passenger side made two separate "creaks" as they were broken loose. No noises at all from the driver side. I have to assume I got one good batch and one bad one because I used one box per bank during installation and didn't inter-mingle them.

I decided to jettison the torque to yield junk and found a set of ARP prevailing torque bolts on Amazon for roughly the same price as the the Fail-Pro and GM bolts (with free prime shipping). Also another set of GM gaskets. In comparing, the GM branded gaskets (with hologram stickers) appear identical to the Mahle branded ones from the first go-round.

Hope to have it back together tomorrow if the ARP bolts deliver on schedule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaab and Mooseman
As I can't seem to edit any of my posts here I will re-iterate DO NOT BUY FEL-PRO BRANDED HEAD BOLTS FOR THIS JOB AT ANY PRICE!!! Even if free you will likely regret your decision.

I'm old-school, and this torque-to-yield stuff is something I've never trusted. Seems to be another cost saving measure that shaves a few dollars off the price of a new vehicle versus buying bolts that are made of quality materials and properly heat treated.

This being my first LS heads-off project, I'll consider it a lesson learned. I may not do another (LS), but if I do it will get ARP bolts or studs. You can keep the stretchy bolts, I want uniform clamping pressure over the entire deck. Idiocy...
 

Forum Statistics

Threads
24,317
Posts
649,245
Members
20,856
Latest member
Erbo

Members Online